You could be right, but I am skeptical. I would like to see evidence—preferably in the form of bibliometric analysis—that practicing scientists who use frequentist statistical techniques (a) don’t make use of background information, and (b) publish more successfully than comparable scientists who do make use of background information.
You could be right, but I am skeptical. I would like to see evidence—preferably in the form of bibliometric analysis—that practicing scientists who use frequentist statistical techniques (a) don’t make use of background information, and (b) publish more successfully than comparable scientists who do make use of background information.