Sure, if you’re a fan of fluff and haven’t been down the “Ultimate AI Idea” street too many times.
(And stating the “obvious” isn’t always a bad thing.)
I agree, which is why I said:
Now, if you were just out to present a new, more accessible introduction to MML, that would be great: stuff that helps people understand the foundation of rationality is welcome here.
But that doesn’t apply here because:
you’re claiming you have a new idea, and yet you’ve already blown over 5,000 words saying nothing new. Commenters asked you last time to get to the point.
Sure, if you’re a fan of fluff and haven’t been down the “Ultimate AI Idea” street too many times.
I agree, which is why I said:
But that doesn’t apply here because: