Once you understand a system at a given level, you can no longer derive information from it by observing it on that level—you have nothing more to learn from it, and so it has nothing more to offer to you.
Which do you find more interesting: chess or Tic-Tac-Toe?
People who derive pleasure from the act of understanding 1) often fail to grasp why people who derive pleasure from not-understanding are hostile to them and 2) usually don’t recognize that their happiness depends upon having a rich and unfamiliar world to learn about.
Once you understand a system at a given level, you can no longer derive information from it by observing it on that level—you have nothing more to learn from it, and so it has nothing more to offer to you.
Which do you find more interesting: chess or Tic-Tac-Toe?
People who derive pleasure from the act of understanding 1) often fail to grasp why people who derive pleasure from not-understanding are hostile to them and 2) usually don’t recognize that their happiness depends upon having a rich and unfamiliar world to learn about.
Why do you think Borgstrom is so popular?