I’d call it empirical, without a doubt: it’s as ‘unrational’ as possible, since it admits every possible computable sequence and selection of which one is determined by observations. If that isn’t empirical...
But is “as un’rational’ as possible” a’rational’?
I’d call it empirical, without a doubt: it’s as ‘unrational’ as possible, since it admits every possible computable sequence and selection of which one is determined by observations. If that isn’t empirical...
But is “as un’rational’ as possible” a’rational’?