It seems like the sentence I quoted indicates that he didn’t consider it a “full theory of time”. I don’t feel like rereading the actual paper, though.
From memory, McTaggart argues that change is a necessary part of our concept of time. That B-theories can’t account for change and that A-theories are incoherent. Consequently, time does not exist (but presumably something with some similarities to time does)
Does it say he rejected the B-Theory?
It seems like the sentence I quoted indicates that he didn’t consider it a “full theory of time”. I don’t feel like rereading the actual paper, though.
Looking at the paper, I find that you’re right.
From memory, McTaggart argues that change is a necessary part of our concept of time. That B-theories can’t account for change and that A-theories are incoherent. Consequently, time does not exist (but presumably something with some similarities to time does)