Small request: given that it’s plausible that a bunch of LW material on this topic will end up quoted out of context, would you mind changing the headline example in section 5 to something less bad-if-quoted-out-of-context?
Yeah, I’d been worrying about that as well. Though if anything, I’m more concerned about the examples I provide in the second paragraph of that section. The titular one is a bit absurd; the other ones are more plausible.
Though if anything, I’m more concerned about the examples I provide in the second paragraph of that section
This is what I initially thought Richard’s suggestion was referring to. I was thinking that you’d keep that the same structure minus some of the more extreme examples in the second paragraph. It would have been a much better solution; the “do not start a thermonuclear war” line was pretty funny!
It was, it was. Unfortunately, we can’t have nice things.
I was thinking replacing it with something like “But No Galaxy-Brain Stuff, Alright?” and “radioactive plans” with “galaxy-brain plans”, but that seems a bit too tongue-in-cheek/positive.
Small request: given that it’s plausible that a bunch of LW material on this topic will end up quoted out of context, would you mind changing the headline example in section 5 to something less bad-if-quoted-out-of-context?
Yeah, I’d been worrying about that as well. Though if anything, I’m more concerned about the examples I provide in the second paragraph of that section. The titular one is a bit absurd; the other ones are more plausible.
Edited all of that. Better?
Yepp, thanks!
This is what I initially thought Richard’s suggestion was referring to. I was thinking that you’d keep that the same structure minus some of the more extreme examples in the second paragraph. It would have been a much better solution; the “do not start a thermonuclear war” line was pretty funny!
It was, it was. Unfortunately, we can’t have nice things.
I was thinking replacing it with something like “But No Galaxy-Brain Stuff, Alright?” and “radioactive plans” with “galaxy-brain plans”, but that seems a bit too tongue-in-cheek/positive.