Thanks 162-163 are missing for me and appear to be relavent. The book also uses its own terminology and diagrams which they describe as “quantish-physics.” I am guessing I would have to read a chunk of the book to be able to double check what was written in the book. Since the OP’s question really does seem tied to the book just as much as what is normally considered the EPR experiment I do not think I will be able to help.
Thanks 162-163 are missing for me and appear to be relavent. The book also uses its own terminology and diagrams which they describe as “quantish-physics.” I am guessing I would have to read a chunk of the book to be able to double check what was written in the book. Since the OP’s question really does seem tied to the book just as much as what is normally considered the EPR experiment I do not think I will be able to help.
Yes. But thanks anyways.