Anna—I’m favorably impressed by this posting! Thanks for making it. It makes me feel a lot better about what SIAI staff mean by rationality.
In the past I’ve had concerns that SIAI’s focus on a future intelligence explosion may be born of explicit reasoning that’s nuts (in the sense of your article), and the present posting does a fair amount to assuage my concerns—I see it as a strong indicator that you and some of the other SIAI staff are vigilant against the dangers of untrustworthy explicit reasoning.
Anna—I’m favorably impressed by this posting! Thanks for making it. It makes me feel a lot better about what SIAI staff mean by rationality.
In the past I’ve had concerns that SIAI’s focus on a future intelligence explosion may be born of explicit reasoning that’s nuts (in the sense of your article), and the present posting does a fair amount to assuage my concerns—I see it as a strong indicator that you and some of the other SIAI staff are vigilant against the dangers of untrustworthy explicit reasoning.
Give Michael my regards.