This theory in the paper might be true, or it might be not true, but in either case it’s not a physics article, it seems to be more like a philosophy article.
it seems very philosophically appealing for many reasons, but I can’t judge its merit as a theory of physics.
This theory in the paper might be true, or it might be not true, but in either case it’s not a physics article, it seems to be more like a philosophy article.
it seems very philosophically appealing for many reasons, but I can’t judge its merit as a theory of physics.