I’d be willing to put serious effort into editing/updating/redrafting the two sections that got the most constructive pushback, if that would help tip things over the edge.
If you could add QAs, this could turn into a certificate that one has verifiably read or copy&past what LessWrong expects its users to know before writing under some tag (with a specific set of QAs for each main tags). Of course LW could also certify that this or that trusted user is welcome on all tags, and chose what tag can or can’t appear in front page.
I’d be willing to put serious effort into editing/updating/redrafting the two sections that got the most constructive pushback, if that would help tip things over the edge.
If you could add QAs, this could turn into a certificate that one has verifiably read or copy&past what LessWrong expects its users to know before writing under some tag (with a specific set of QAs for each main tags). Of course LW could also certify that this or that trusted user is welcome on all tags, and chose what tag can or can’t appear in front page.