Fair point. The short version is that it expands the scope of ‘what is endorsed by the respected’ from just the things they say themselves to the things they indicate they endorse, and this expands the scope of what social proof is affecting.
It seems obvious in my head, but I should have elaborated (and may edit it in, actually, once I have a long version).
Fair point. The short version is that it expands the scope of ‘what is endorsed by the respected’ from just the things they say themselves to the things they indicate they endorse, and this expands the scope of what social proof is affecting.
It seems obvious in my head, but I should have elaborated (and may edit it in, actually, once I have a long version).