Excellent. I think you would write an excellent article, and Jsalvatier I see has put up some $.
Regarding $ vs time, typically if you have 10 equally skilled people who can each either donate $30k/yr or offer $30k/yr worth of labour, you end up best off having 7 donors and 3 workers, because you have to pay salaries to the workers (even if small salaries), plus overheads, plus money spent on tangibles like advertising. And probably at least one of your 3 workers should be a dedicated fund-raiser/donor relations.
So even if someone can offer skilled, ideologically dedicated labour, 66% of such people should just become donors.
Excellent. I think you would write an excellent article, and Jsalvatier I see has put up some $.
Regarding $ vs time, typically if you have 10 equally skilled people who can each either donate $30k/yr or offer $30k/yr worth of labour, you end up best off having 7 donors and 3 workers, because you have to pay salaries to the workers (even if small salaries), plus overheads, plus money spent on tangibles like advertising. And probably at least one of your 3 workers should be a dedicated fund-raiser/donor relations.
So even if someone can offer skilled, ideologically dedicated labour, 66% of such people should just become donors.