I recommend either adding a very short explanation of what “Bruce” is or explicitly stating that familiarity with the concept is mandatory (e.g. by reading the provided link).
Probably this one: Stuck in the middle with Bruce (first mentioned on Less Wrong here.
I found it only ambiguous at the beginning – the post itself seems to do a good enough job of explaining it eventually.
I recommend either adding a very short explanation of what “Bruce” is or explicitly stating that familiarity with the concept is mandatory (e.g. by reading the provided link).
Probably this one: Stuck in the middle with Bruce (first mentioned on Less Wrong here.
I found it only ambiguous at the beginning – the post itself seems to do a good enough job of explaining it eventually.