I don’t know why you’re talking about the Newcomb problem again. I’ve already said I don’t see how that’s relevant. Can you tell me how, in my setup, the fixed point being 50⁄50 means the oracle has no predictive power over the agent?
If 50⁄50 is a fixed point then the agent clearly has predictive power, just like we have predictive power over what happens if you measure a qubit in the state (|0⟩+|1⟩)/√2. 50% doesn’t imply “lack of predictive power”.
I don’t know why you’re talking about the Newcomb problem again. I’ve already said I don’t see how that’s relevant. Can you tell me how, in my setup, the fixed point being 50⁄50 means the oracle has no predictive power over the agent?
If 50⁄50 is a fixed point then the agent clearly has predictive power, just like we have predictive power over what happens if you measure a qubit in the state (|0⟩+|1⟩)/√2. 50% doesn’t imply “lack of predictive power”.