It looks like this is a response to the passing link to http://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Complexity_of_value in the article. At first I didn’t understand what in the article you were responding to.
The article it was posted in response to was this one—from the conclusion of the post:
http://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Complexity_of_value
That’s a wiki article—which can’t be responded to directly. The point I raise is an old controversy now. This message seems rather redundant now—since the question it responded to has subsequently been dramatically edited.
Yes, I edited, but before your response. Sorry for the confusion.
It looks like this is a response to the passing link to http://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Complexity_of_value in the article. At first I didn’t understand what in the article you were responding to.
The article it was posted in response to was this one—from the conclusion of the post:
http://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Complexity_of_value
That’s a wiki article—which can’t be responded to directly. The point I raise is an old controversy now. This message seems rather redundant now—since the question it responded to has subsequently been dramatically edited.
Yes, I edited, but before your response. Sorry for the confusion.