It’s simply dissolving some cognitive illusions he shouldn’t have had in the first place, but that most of us have probably had at some point in our lives. If you’ve got intelligence at 2 standard deviations above average, and you overestimate your own intelligence by one standard deviation (which is probably a pretty common mistake, and if anything underestimates the effect) than you’ll see that you’re probably the most intelligent person you interact with on a regular basis. If you’re out at 3 standard deviations, it may not be until college that you see that some of your fellow students, or at least some of your professors, are indisputably smarter than you. If you’re out at 4 or 5 standard deviations, as I imagine Eliezer is (I myself can’t honestly peg myself past 3.5 standard deviations, which means I’m probably around 2 standard deviations above average and can’t really distinguish beyond 2 standard deviations above my own level), I have some difficulty imagining what that must be like, only that even in the things you read you won’t find many minds as formidable as your (perception of) your own, and even rarer will be minds that clearly surpass your own.
But I think he is in the camp of trying to improve human intelligence (or at least human rationality, gwern seems to be the better poster child for improving human intelligence). Hence the sequences.
Not sure how homeschooling is relevant here, but speaking as a homeschooled person: it goes both ways, you’re also the stupidest person in a class of one.
(This seems like the wrong thread for a protracted discussion but I’m happy to say more in an open thread or via PM if you want to hear more, although it sounds like it’s a moot point for you.)
It’s simply dissolving some cognitive illusions he shouldn’t have had in the first place, but that most of us have probably had at some point in our lives. If you’ve got intelligence at 2 standard deviations above average, and you overestimate your own intelligence by one standard deviation (which is probably a pretty common mistake, and if anything underestimates the effect) than you’ll see that you’re probably the most intelligent person you interact with on a regular basis. If you’re out at 3 standard deviations, it may not be until college that you see that some of your fellow students, or at least some of your professors, are indisputably smarter than you. If you’re out at 4 or 5 standard deviations, as I imagine Eliezer is (I myself can’t honestly peg myself past 3.5 standard deviations, which means I’m probably around 2 standard deviations above average and can’t really distinguish beyond 2 standard deviations above my own level), I have some difficulty imagining what that must be like, only that even in the things you read you won’t find many minds as formidable as your (perception of) your own, and even rarer will be minds that clearly surpass your own.
But I think he is in the camp of trying to improve human intelligence (or at least human rationality, gwern seems to be the better poster child for improving human intelligence). Hence the sequences.
Is a home-schooled person well positioned to judge that sort of thing? They’re the smartest kind in a class of one.
Not sure how homeschooling is relevant here, but speaking as a homeschooled person: it goes both ways, you’re also the stupidest person in a class of one.
Sidenote: I’d homeschool my kids if it were allowed where I live.
(This seems like the wrong thread for a protracted discussion but I’m happy to say more in an open thread or via PM if you want to hear more, although it sounds like it’s a moot point for you.)
(I do want to hear more, go ahead using any means you’d like.)
OK: http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/gbw/open_thread_january_1631_2013/8bdp