There are technological solutions to these problems. As a whole, they cost money, because eg reduced CO2 emission is an additional criteria to meet, and adding restrictions increases costs. My current cost estimate for the cheapest feasible full mitigation of CO2 emissions is $70/ton, which is now ~$2.6 trillion / year globally. That cost is too high for that to be done.
Large investments are going into “technology” for this. You cannot lump “technology” together as a single thing. Feasible approaches are mostly not what is being invested in, because the people directing money tend to have little relevant technical knowledge and live in a world of simulacra.
There are technological solutions to these problems. As a whole, they cost money, because eg reduced CO2 emission is an additional criteria to meet, and adding restrictions increases costs. My current cost estimate for the cheapest feasible full mitigation of CO2 emissions is $70/ton, which is now ~$2.6 trillion / year globally. That cost is too high for that to be done.
Large investments are going into “technology” for this. You cannot lump “technology” together as a single thing. Feasible approaches are mostly not what is being invested in, because the people directing money tend to have little relevant technical knowledge and live in a world of simulacra.