Sure. And my standard reply will be, “Eliezer repeatedly claims that I’m misinterpreting him in order to avoid addressing inconsistencies or ambiguities in what he has said.”
You’re doing it again.
Er, did you misparse? I think you read
Eliezer repeatedly claims that I’m (misinterpreting him in order to avoid addressing inconsistencies or ambiguities in what he has said)
I thnk he meant
Eliezer repeatedly claims (that I’m misinterpreting him) in order to avoid addressing inconsistencies or ambiguities in what he has said
I have to say, I disagree with much of what he says but PhilGoetz has never struck me as one of the site’s ne’er-do-wells.
Sure. And my standard reply will be, “Eliezer repeatedly claims that I’m misinterpreting him in order to avoid addressing inconsistencies or ambiguities in what he has said.”
You’re doing it again.
Er, did you misparse? I think you read
Eliezer repeatedly claims that I’m (misinterpreting him in order to avoid addressing inconsistencies or ambiguities in what he has said)
I thnk he meant
Eliezer repeatedly claims (that I’m misinterpreting him) in order to avoid addressing inconsistencies or ambiguities in what he has said
I have to say, I disagree with much of what he says but PhilGoetz has never struck me as one of the site’s ne’er-do-wells.