Please don’t hesitate to point it out if you think i have completely misunderstood the purpose of the Discussion section
No, this is what the discussion section is for. But I do think you have completely misunderstood the purpose of the book “The 48 Laws of Power”. Taking it as a literal list of rules to be followed is a subversion of the intent. Greene spends as much time explaining when the rule works and even when to do completely reverse the rule as he does on the straightforward application itself.
The rules listed there are best considered mere chapter headings. To be full specifications of rules you would need to add all sorts of details like “If X && Y && (K <23%) then RULE elseif J then -RULE else null”.
I don’t endorse the wikipedia rule list but I certainly recommend reading the book. It’s entertaining, insightful and useful for building one’s social awareness and competence.
No, this is what the discussion section is for. But I do think you have completely misunderstood the purpose of the book “The 48 Laws of Power”. Taking it as a literal list of rules to be followed is a subversion of the intent. Greene spends as much time explaining when the rule works and even when to do completely reverse the rule as he does on the straightforward application itself.
The rules listed there are best considered mere chapter headings. To be full specifications of rules you would need to add all sorts of details like “If X && Y && (K <23%) then RULE elseif J then -RULE else null”.
I don’t endorse the wikipedia rule list but I certainly recommend reading the book. It’s entertaining, insightful and useful for building one’s social awareness and competence.