I don’t know the PUA philosophy well enough but it seems to me that it does not look at females as inherently passive. PUA techniques often stress the need for the male to be assertive, but that’s a far cry from looking at flirtation as a purely one-sided exercise.
In general I think of PUA as teaching mimicry: it’s a set of skills to signal being high-status and desireable without necessary being high-status and desireable.
My impression is that “notice when there’s someone who keeps looking at you and approach them” is a common enough theme in PUA that… wait, no, even if that’s there I’m not sure if it is for day game so it might still apply to that, although day game seems to be considered a more advanced set of tactics, so that would still weaken its applicability.
notice when there’s someone who keeps looking at you and approach them
You do realize that stuff like that doesn’t happen in PUA’s target audience. And even of someone does notice you, if he approaches her without game she quickly looses interest.
I don’t know the PUA philosophy well enough but it seems to me that it does not look at females as inherently passive. PUA techniques often stress the need for the male to be assertive, but that’s a far cry from looking at flirtation as a purely one-sided exercise.
In general I think of PUA as teaching mimicry: it’s a set of skills to signal being high-status and desireable without necessary being high-status and desireable.
My impression is that “notice when there’s someone who keeps looking at you and approach them” is a common enough theme in PUA that… wait, no, even if that’s there I’m not sure if it is for day game so it might still apply to that, although day game seems to be considered a more advanced set of tactics, so that would still weaken its applicability.
You do realize that stuff like that doesn’t happen in PUA’s target audience. And even of someone does notice you, if he approaches her without game she quickly looses interest.