If we assume that behavior has a genetical component, and that mutations are random, than would imply that some behaviors we observe are at least partially random. Do you disagree with this?
If that randomness in the behavior happens to be harmful, would it be okay to call it a “bug”?
I may dislike my decisions or habits. But to understand if it’s a “bug” or not I would need to have a near complete understanding of my own thinking. I don’t think I have that. So I don’t see any goal/gain of conceptualizing something as a “bug”. If my behavior depends on genes or weather or anything else it’s not relevant for me at the moment.
If we assume that behavior has a genetical component, and that mutations are random, than would imply that some behaviors we observe are at least partially random. Do you disagree with this?
If that randomness in the behavior happens to be harmful, would it be okay to call it a “bug”?
I’m not sure it would change much for me.
I may dislike my decisions or habits. But to understand if it’s a “bug” or not I would need to have a near complete understanding of my own thinking. I don’t think I have that. So I don’t see any goal/gain of conceptualizing something as a “bug”. If my behavior depends on genes or weather or anything else it’s not relevant for me at the moment.