I agree; open discussion and red-teaming are valuable and I’m not concerned by your proposed (anti-?) financial attack vector. To quote Bostrom:
There are many ways of responding to information hazards. In many cases, the best response is no response, i.e., to proceed as though no such hazard existed. The benefits of information may so far outweigh its costs that even when information hazards are fully accounted for, we still under-invest in the gathering and dissemination of information. Moreover, ignorance carries its own dangers which are oftentimes greater than those of knowledge.
I agree; open discussion and red-teaming are valuable and I’m not concerned by your proposed (anti-?) financial attack vector. To quote Bostrom: