Interesting. I wasn’t aware of the specific equations, but at a first glance, that does seem like a reasonable argument—thanks!
Also, to follow up on my second comment (sorry, the formatting was a bit confusing but I just edited it): I think it would’ve been valuable for the blog post to end with a more concrete “bridge” to the solutions as the current version is fairly generic.
Interesting. I wasn’t aware of the specific equations, but at a first glance, that does seem like a reasonable argument—thanks!
Also, to follow up on my second comment (sorry, the formatting was a bit confusing but I just edited it): I think it would’ve been valuable for the blog post to end with a more concrete “bridge” to the solutions as the current version is fairly generic.
Good point. Will add a bit of a better bridge for part 3 (that I hope to realease in a week).