He’s signalling contrarianism, specifically an anti-progressive political attitude. Note that the first sentence is a statement, and I would bet a large amount of money that it’s true, based on no more evidence than I’ve seen on this page. The second sentence is pure snark.
90% of right-wingers here often talk so as to get it—but somehow, being less Sam-like, they manage to do so NOT at the expense of our community and the level of debate. Therefore, they only rarely get downvoted. Hell, you’re often sympathetic to such things; shouldn’t you try to censure Sam for undermining your and your fellows’ image?
He’s signalling contrarianism, specifically an anti-progressive political attitude. Note that the first sentence is a statement, and I would bet a large amount of money that it’s true, based on no more evidence than I’ve seen on this page. The second sentence is pure snark.
Hey don’t be too hard on him, a man needs to get his metacontrarian fix somewhere!
90% of right-wingers here often talk so as to get it—but somehow, being less Sam-like, they manage to do so NOT at the expense of our community and the level of debate. Therefore, they only rarely get downvoted. Hell, you’re often sympathetic to such things; shouldn’t you try to censure Sam for undermining your and your fellows’ image?