Philosophy and religion are very similar in their reverence for language. They both make the same essential mistake: they confer language with a power it does not have.
I think you will find that philosophers are very well aware of the limitations of langage. More so than just about anyone else.
Language does something [..] for the philosopher it’s the non-actual possible world.
Philosophers currently talk about PW’s, but that does not mean they reify them. (What would non-actual mean)? And don’t forget that some scientiss, and some less wrongers, and EY himself, do believe in alternate worlds. You need a better example. Or a different theory.
I think you will find that philosophers are very well aware of the limitations of langage. More so than just about anyone else.
Philosophers currently talk about PW’s, but that does not mean they reify them. (What would non-actual mean)? And don’t forget that some scientiss, and some less wrongers, and EY himself, do believe in alternate worlds. You need a better example. Or a different theory.