Good point. I was thinking of the book as being a capstone or some end-of-the-road marker on the subject of epistemic rationality—like once it was published, LW could say “that’s that” and focus on something else. In retrospect, that is trying to make the world look like a story.
Good point. I was thinking of the book as being a capstone or some end-of-the-road marker on the subject of epistemic rationality—like once it was published, LW could say “that’s that” and focus on something else. In retrospect, that is trying to make the world look like a story.