Alternatively, write backwards. Write in such way that reading backwards isn’t more engaging than reading forwards. The reader can probably handle it if you start with the conclusion. Having said that, I’m not sure what the best order is. Maybe conclusion then motivation, then explanation why conclusion solves the motivational problem? Maybe I’m missing some more parts? Maybe motivation and explanation should be broken into pieces and interleaved with increaing verbosity?
Alternatively, write backwards. Write in such way that reading backwards isn’t more engaging than reading forwards. The reader can probably handle it if you start with the conclusion. Having said that, I’m not sure what the best order is. Maybe conclusion then motivation, then explanation why conclusion solves the motivational problem? Maybe I’m missing some more parts? Maybe motivation and explanation should be broken into pieces and interleaved with increaing verbosity?