That I can’t argue with, though it wouldn’t follow from that that UCMAs are likely to be false.
EDIT: you edited your post, and so my reply doesn’t seem to make sense. In answer to your new question, I would say ‘I don’t, I just want some presentation of the argument on which its validity (or invalidity) is obvious’.
Why would you want to formalize the argument?
That I can’t argue with, though it wouldn’t follow from that that UCMAs are likely to be false.
EDIT: you edited your post, and so my reply doesn’t seem to make sense. In answer to your new question, I would say ‘I don’t, I just want some presentation of the argument on which its validity (or invalidity) is obvious’.