I appreciate the summary, especially as it’s such a long article. But I downvoted, because there was a discussion post on this exact article three days ago. If either this was written as a comment to that post, OR if that post was mentioned as being about the same article, then I would have upvoted.
Neither—I missed a lot of posts starting Feb 18 because of a wave of sickness sweeping through my household. Things are just getting back to normal now.
I appreciate the summary, especially as it’s such a long article. But I downvoted, because there was a discussion post on this exact article three days ago. If either this was written as a comment to that post, OR if that post was mentioned as being about the same article, then I would have upvoted.
Huh, I didn’t notice that one. My mistake.
For what it’s worth, I missed the prior discussion post but noticed this one.
Interesting. Do you think it was my title you missed or Kaj’s name that you noticed?
Neither—I missed a lot of posts starting Feb 18 because of a wave of sickness sweeping through my household. Things are just getting back to normal now.
Downvoted? Odd… enlighten plz?
Someone doesn’t think it was a good excuse? Not that you deserve it here, but I wouldn’t worry about a random downvote.
I’m not fashed about the downvote, just baffled.
I avoided the article based on its headline. Thanks for extracting some interesting material.