That’s fair to ‘aspire to a higher standard,’ and I’ll avoid adding screenshots of text in the future.
However, I must say, the ‘higher standard’ and commitment to remain serious for even a shortform post kind of turns me off from posting on LessWrong in the first place. If this is the culture that people here want, then that’s fine and I won’t tell this website to change, but I don’t personally like the (what I find as) over-seriousness.
I do understand the point about sharing text to make it easier for disabled people (I just don’t always think of it).
Eh, random people complain. Screenshots of text seems fine, especially in shortform. It honestly seems fine anywhere. I also really don’t think that accessibility should matter much here, the number of people reading on a screenreader or using assistive technologies are quite small, if they browse LessWrong they will already be running into a bunch of problems, and there are pretty good OCR technologies around these days that can be integrated into those.
I have some idea about how much work it takes to maintain something like LW.com, so this random person would like to take this opportunity to thank you for running LW for the last many years.
That’s fair to ‘aspire to a higher standard,’ and I’ll avoid adding screenshots of text in the future.
However, I must say, the ‘higher standard’ and commitment to remain serious for even a shortform post kind of turns me off from posting on LessWrong in the first place. If this is the culture that people here want, then that’s fine and I won’t tell this website to change, but I don’t personally like the (what I find as) over-seriousness.
I do understand the point about sharing text to make it easier for disabled people (I just don’t always think of it).
Eh, random people complain. Screenshots of text seems fine, especially in shortform. It honestly seems fine anywhere. I also really don’t think that accessibility should matter much here, the number of people reading on a screenreader or using assistive technologies are quite small, if they browse LessWrong they will already be running into a bunch of problems, and there are pretty good OCR technologies around these days that can be integrated into those.
I have some idea about how much work it takes to maintain something like LW.com, so this random person would like to take this opportunity to thank you for running LW for the last many years.
Thank you! :)