Honestly I didn’t quite understand your post. This is the closest I got...
“People do understand how they benefit from other people’s freedom… but they voted this down because they prefer to focus on style rather than substance.”
The second part can’t be right though so I just chose to respond to the first part.
but they voted this down because they prefer to focus on style rather than substance
Engaging in rational arguments is more than a style issue. If your post isn’t making a rational argument for the position that you advocate, then it has no substance, regardless whether there are other people out there how could make a rational argument for the position.
Do you understand how you benefit from other people’s freedom? If so, would you mind explaining it to me?
Yes. No.
Neither of those questions have a relevance to my post.
Honestly I didn’t quite understand your post. This is the closest I got...
“People do understand how they benefit from other people’s freedom… but they voted this down because they prefer to focus on style rather than substance.”
The second part can’t be right though so I just chose to respond to the first part.
Engaging in rational arguments is more than a style issue. If your post isn’t making a rational argument for the position that you advocate, then it has no substance, regardless whether there are other people out there how could make a rational argument for the position.