What do you think of implementing a test-run of our techniques by solving a problem:
We choose to estimate something that is currently unknown, but which we expect will be resolved later. Later, we compare our estimate with the actual result—“Did we win or lose?”, and we can analyze why.
I had suggested some questions about rational response to H1N1 here, but the information seems to have already caught up with my need for it. Are there any other questions of interest that we could work on?
If you want to start solving a problem, in a new thread, maybe wait and see if discussing such a real-world problem (here in this post) is group-approved first.
What do you think of implementing a test-run of our techniques by solving a problem: We choose to estimate something that is currently unknown, but which we expect will be resolved later. Later, we compare our estimate with the actual result—“Did we win or lose?”, and we can analyze why.
I had suggested some questions about rational response to H1N1 here, but the information seems to have already caught up with my need for it. Are there any other questions of interest that we could work on?
If you want to start solving a problem, in a new thread, maybe wait and see if discussing such a real-world problem (here in this post) is group-approved first.
I’m no longer interested in H1N1 because the information has finally caught up with my need for it.
Are there any other questions of interest that we could debate about?
Diet, sleep, exercise.
global warming/climate change (a science question and a politics question. But with a focus on science, and perhaps political distortion)
The best method of alternative education.
the most effective motivational techniques/positive psychology techniques.
which emerging technologies are most promising (pyrolysis, wind/solar/tidal, nanotech, etc)