I agree with you. I’ll watch my own comments and try to avoid tvtropes jargon. In addition, I might decide to find the few most commonly used pieces of it on here and put pages for them on the wiki which people can then link to. Does that strike people as a good idea, or a bad idea, or a waste of time?
There are definitely some TV Tropes concepts that deserve exposure and/or formalization over here, but there’s a style mismatch: TV Tropes jargon is meant to be funny, accessible, and clear (in roughly that order in practice, although policy reverses it) to an audience of mostly young media nerds. Consequently it comes off as lulzy and incomprehensible to people who are not young media nerds. I don’t think that lines up very well with what this site is trying to do.
I’d recommend writing up the relevant concepts in Less Wrong style, with original names (or the standard names if applicable), but citing TV Tropes as appropriate.
Most of the Logic Tropes index could find a home rewritten as articles or on the wiki, as would about half the Intelligence Tropes. “TV Genius” strikes me as a particularly good candidate, if we don’t already cover the idea in some form (which is more than possible).
There’s also a large set of tropes that would make good resources for an article, but which would require a very different treatment to flourish here; “And Man Grew Proud” comes to mind.
That’s the main thing I was worried about. If it occurred to you too, there’s probably good reason to worry. I won’t do it.
EDIT: I have made a couple wiki articles inspired by TVtropes, but not the ones that are overused on here.
I agree with you. I’ll watch my own comments and try to avoid tvtropes jargon. In addition, I might decide to find the few most commonly used pieces of it on here and put pages for them on the wiki which people can then link to. Does that strike people as a good idea, or a bad idea, or a waste of time?
There are definitely some TV Tropes concepts that deserve exposure and/or formalization over here, but there’s a style mismatch: TV Tropes jargon is meant to be funny, accessible, and clear (in roughly that order in practice, although policy reverses it) to an audience of mostly young media nerds. Consequently it comes off as lulzy and incomprehensible to people who are not young media nerds. I don’t think that lines up very well with what this site is trying to do.
I’d recommend writing up the relevant concepts in Less Wrong style, with original names (or the standard names if applicable), but citing TV Tropes as appropriate.
Which ones were you thinking of as being relevant? I’d be happy to write them up with better or the same names.
Most of the Logic Tropes index could find a home rewritten as articles or on the wiki, as would about half the Intelligence Tropes. “TV Genius” strikes me as a particularly good candidate, if we don’t already cover the idea in some form (which is more than possible).
There’s also a large set of tropes that would make good resources for an article, but which would require a very different treatment to flourish here; “And Man Grew Proud” comes to mind.
I turned Sound Valid True from TVtropes into Sound logic and Valid logic on the wiki here. More may come later.
Strikes me like an idea that would encourage people to use that jargon by ‘officially’ incorporating it over here. Not a good idea...
That’s the main thing I was worried about. If it occurred to you too, there’s probably good reason to worry. I won’t do it. EDIT: I have made a couple wiki articles inspired by TVtropes, but not the ones that are overused on here.