These people are well-suited… because their mind naturally sees → because their minds naturally see
since, after all consequentialism says to rob banks → since, after all,
They do not do a double-take and say “What?” That → [Sentence ends without punctuation outside the quote.]
strong established injunctions against bank-robbing specifically exactly. → bank-robbing specifically. / bank-robbing exactly.
a genre-savvy person who knows that the viewer would say if → what the viewer would say
the story’s antagonists, might possibly hypothetically panic. But still, one should present the story-antagonists → [inconsistent phrasing for story’s antagonists / story-antagonists]
Also, I didn’t understand parts of the sentence which ends like this:
taking things at face value and all sorts of extreme forces that break things and that you couldn’t full test under before facing them.
Potential typos:
In a domain like → In a domain like that
These people are well-suited… because their mind naturally sees → because their minds naturally see
since, after all consequentialism says to rob banks → since, after all,
They do not do a double-take and say “What?” That → [Sentence ends without punctuation outside the quote.]
strong established injunctions against bank-robbing specifically exactly. → bank-robbing specifically. / bank-robbing exactly.
a genre-savvy person who knows that the viewer would say if → what the viewer would say
the story’s antagonists, might possibly hypothetically panic. But still, one should present the story-antagonists → [inconsistent phrasing for story’s antagonists / story-antagonists]
Also, I didn’t understand parts of the sentence which ends like this: