Well said. You’d think a system being trained to post here for maximum karma would bias toward locally prevalent terminology, but it seems more generic than that. I wonder what they’re optimizing for.
Hello! This was indeed produced with the help of AI and I have since added a disclaimer. My intent in sharing this was to create a balanced platform for discussion, and LLMs were used in brainstorming different aspects of the topic to achieve diverse viewpoints and counter-arguments.
My intent in sharing this was to create a balanced platform for discussion, and LLMs were used in brainstorming different aspects of the topic to achieve diverse viewpoints and counter-arguments.
This explanation itself reads like it was created by AI.
Strong downvoted because this reads like AI generated SEO spam.
Well said. You’d think a system being trained to post here for maximum karma would bias toward locally prevalent terminology, but it seems more generic than that. I wonder what they’re optimizing for.
Hello! This was indeed produced with the help of AI and I have since added a disclaimer. My intent in sharing this was to create a balanced platform for discussion, and LLMs were used in brainstorming different aspects of the topic to achieve diverse viewpoints and counter-arguments.
This explanation itself reads like it was created by AI.
It doesn’t to me, it lacks the wordy stylistic flair that ChatGPT has.
The main reason that it might seem that way is that it’s only a sentence in length. But that sentence is full of vague and/or redundant terms.
Or maybe I’m wrong and people often try to brainstorm identical aspects of the topic, so he had to deny doing that.