Meters-Briggs has a junk, so that’s fine. My past romantic partners have consistent big five profile either.
Sure there are sources of bias. I can’t control for them. But th
No generalizability needed. It just has to work for me and the women I normally date. Who cares if it would work for the “average guy”
I have no reason to assume a small effect size. My current positive rate on dates is 20%. Lots of room for improvement.
The subjectivity isn’t a problem because I’m the analyst and implementer. I don’t need well defined terms like communicating an academic study. I can reproduce the study from memory whenever I want.
Finally, there is no real cost to the study. Currently I’m ambivalent between treatment and control.
Meters-Briggs has a junk, so that’s fine. My past romantic partners have consistent big five profile either.
Sure there are sources of bias. I can’t control for them. But th
No generalizability needed. It just has to work for me and the women I normally date. Who cares if it would work for the “average guy”
I have no reason to assume a small effect size. My current positive rate on dates is 20%. Lots of room for improvement.
The subjectivity isn’t a problem because I’m the analyst and implementer. I don’t need well defined terms like communicating an academic study. I can reproduce the study from memory whenever I want.
Finally, there is no real cost to the study. Currently I’m ambivalent between treatment and control.