If I program a simulation of the SBP and run it under illusionist principles, aren’t the simulated Halfers going to inevitably win on average? After all, it’s a fair coin.
Can you explain what you mean by “underdetermined” in this context? How is there any ambiguity in resolving the payouts if the game is run as a third person simulation?
Sure. Also coherent to be an illusionist who accepts the Halfer position in the SBP. It’s an underdetermined problem.
If I program a simulation of the SBP and run it under illusionist principles, aren’t the simulated Halfers going to inevitably win on average? After all, it’s a fair coin.
It depends upon how you score it, which is why both the original problem and various decision-problem variants are underdetermined.
Can you explain what you mean by “underdetermined” in this context? How is there any ambiguity in resolving the payouts if the game is run as a third person simulation?