Yes, turchin’s argument I meant. But I don’t need it just to discuss consequences.
You claim to be distressed by the consequences. Why be distressed by the consequences of something you have no good reason to believe.
I do. Unification (Bostrom’s term) seems to be almost irrefutable, and therefore Dust Theory is at least partly right.
Bostrom himself appears to reject Unification.
His arguments suck.
You need to say why .
Measure. His arguments do not account for it.
Measure can lead to just about any conclusion, depending on how you define it.
Yes, turchin’s argument I meant. But I don’t need it just to discuss consequences.
You claim to be distressed by the consequences. Why be distressed by the consequences of something you have no good reason to believe.
I do. Unification (Bostrom’s term) seems to be almost irrefutable, and therefore Dust Theory is at least partly right.
Bostrom himself appears to reject Unification.
His arguments suck.
You need to say why .
Measure. His arguments do not account for it.
Measure can lead to just about any conclusion, depending on how you define it.