In the context of quantilization, we apply limited steam to projects to protect ourselves from Goodhart. “Full steam” is classically rational, but we do not always want that. We might even conjecture that we never want that.
So you never do anything with your full strength, because getting results is bad?
Well, by ‘we’ you mean both ‘you’ and ‘a thing you are designing with quantilization’.
So you never do anything with your full strength, because getting results is bad?
Well, by ‘we’ you mean both ‘you’ and ‘a thing you are designing with quantilization’.
Anything name-able and not hopelessly vague seems to be bad to full-strength optimize. Although we should be open to exceptions to that.
As a life philosophy, it might be pretty uninspiring.