The answer is yes, trivially, because under a wide enough conception of computation, basically everything is simulatable, so everything is evidence for the simulation hypothesis because it includes effectively everything.
It will not help you infer anything else though.
More below:
http://www.amirrorclear.net/academic/ideas/simulation/index.html
https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.08747
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
The answer is yes, trivially, because under a wide enough conception of computation, basically everything is simulatable, so everything is evidence for the simulation hypothesis because it includes effectively everything.
It will not help you infer anything else though.
More below:
http://www.amirrorclear.net/academic/ideas/simulation/index.html
https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.08747