That’s a strawman argument. You’re implying your idea is the only on she’d ever hear.
If that same highschool dropout (not sure why she has to be a girl you feminist) were to hear more ideas on the subject, with her opinion conforming with the winning argument, eventually she’d land on the correct one.
I’m sure there are a few accepted incorrect scientific theories running around at the moment, but we have to accept them while they’re the best we have in order to come to the next logical conclusion.
That’s a strawman argument. You’re implying your idea is the only on she’d ever hear. If that same highschool dropout (not sure why she has to be a girl you feminist) were to hear more ideas on the subject, with her opinion conforming with the winning argument, eventually she’d land on the correct one. I’m sure there are a few accepted incorrect scientific theories running around at the moment, but we have to accept them while they’re the best we have in order to come to the next logical conclusion.
How did this merrit negative points
That’s not the whole argument, there’s a lot more if you actually follow the link. Hence you were bashing a strawman (albiet understandably so).
Trying using the principle of charity next time.
Also, feminism is a boo light with some round these parts—particularly a weak accusation like you made.