I did a version of this (what I would call a sense of the main story line for me personally) here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6MYsKeTjKk
Romeo I listened to your dialog. I hear that you are working on the is/ought gap from the ought side. If I may ask, what is the purpose of this work?
I describe it a different way in Towards an Intentional Research Agenda. But basically I think trying to constrain intentions algorithmically is a type error.
I did a version of this (what I would call a sense of the main story line for me personally) here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6MYsKeTjKk
Romeo I listened to your dialog. I hear that you are working on the is/ought gap from the ought side. If I may ask, what is the purpose of this work?
I describe it a different way in Towards an Intentional Research Agenda. But basically I think trying to constrain intentions algorithmically is a type error.