I think that Subhan and Obert may represent two sides of a false dichotomy, namely the idea that there’s either one absolute morality for all minds, or it’s all subjective. But a third possibility exists—that of objective morality, where the results depend on the physical nature of the being in question, but not their whims.
I think that Subhan and Obert may represent two sides of a false dichotomy, namely the idea that there’s either one absolute morality for all minds, or it’s all subjective. But a third possibility exists—that of objective morality, where the results depend on the physical nature of the being in question, but not their whims.
Correct. So much for “EY has the answer to everything”.