Quick comment: Terren Suydam’s version of “evolutionary psychology” is not the academically accepted one. Conventional academic evolutionary explanations of morality rely on neither group selection nor selection on cultures.
Be that as it may, I would have to say that an explanation of morality made strictly in terms of the academically accepted version of evolutionary psychology is not possible. I’m not trying to redefine the term—just saying what else would be necessary to make an explanation of morality on that basis possible.
Quick comment: Terren Suydam’s version of “evolutionary psychology” is not the academically accepted one. Conventional academic evolutionary explanations of morality rely on neither group selection nor selection on cultures.
Be that as it may, I would have to say that an explanation of morality made strictly in terms of the academically accepted version of evolutionary psychology is not possible. I’m not trying to redefine the term—just saying what else would be necessary to make an explanation of morality on that basis possible.