posts specifically aimed at people who, for one reason or another, are involved in capabilities or thinking of being involved in capabilities, but feel guilty about doing so. (Writing one of these myself, actually.)
Better at-a-glance notes about the “iffy” parts of orgs. E.g. If there’s a big wiki/table/community-list/whatever of different groups, have flags for like “they’re moving the capabilities frontier forward” or “This group isn’t hiring much for actual alignment position”.
Better ideas would be as specific and public-facing and, yes, even in the same OOM as opinionated as these, I think. Even just “other people are saying X Y Z about this group”, or a “community notes” type feature, if a platform doesn’t want to “take a stand” on a group that e.g. might be funding them.
I imagine there’s a way for LW and/or widely-seen posts on it to prevent the talent-funnel noted.
Can you say more details about what you mean here? I found the phrasing here a bit hard to parse.
A few off-the-cuff ideas:
posts specifically aimed at people who, for one reason or another, are involved in capabilities or thinking of being involved in capabilities, but feel guilty about doing so. (Writing one of these myself, actually.)
Better at-a-glance notes about the “iffy” parts of orgs. E.g. If there’s a big wiki/table/community-list/whatever of different groups, have flags for like “they’re moving the capabilities frontier forward” or “This group isn’t hiring much for actual alignment position”.
Better ideas would be as specific and public-facing and, yes, even in the same OOM as opinionated as these, I think. Even just “other people are saying X Y Z about this group”, or a “community notes” type feature, if a platform doesn’t want to “take a stand” on a group that e.g. might be funding them.