There is a big difference between a lucrative monopolistic position (created by intellectual-property law and the huge costs of designing and fabbing microprocessors) and many of the other situations firms find themselves in.
Also, I do not see how your link supports your position. Is Grove not saying that he found himself in a postion in which if Intel had failed even once, it would never have recovered its greatness? How is that
There is a big difference between a lucrative monopolistic position (created by intellectual-property law and the huge costs of designing and fabbing microprocessors) and many of the other situations firms find themselves in.
Also, I do not see how your link supports your position. Is Grove not saying that he found himself in a postion in which if Intel had failed even once, it would never have recovered its greatness? How is that