One can delve indefinitely into any subtopic, but with diminishing returns. Do you think that it doesn’t address most of the higher-level topic areas, if not all of the issues arising therein?
No, I think it does a pretty good job of that. I’m not arguing that the book should be different than it is. I’m just saying that it definitely doesn’t synthesize “most” pre-existing work.
One can delve indefinitely into any subtopic, but with diminishing returns. Do you think that it doesn’t address most of the higher-level topic areas, if not all of the issues arising therein?
No, I think it does a pretty good job of that. I’m not arguing that the book should be different than it is. I’m just saying that it definitely doesn’t synthesize “most” pre-existing work.