@Hal: “Human augmentation” means things like neuropharmeceuticals, gene therapy, or even brain-computer interfaces, not full-scale human-equiv uploading and simulation before the first AI.
Robin, I would consider Norvig a very separate issue from Schank or Brooks. Either that or Stuart Russell wrote all the good parts of “AI a modern approach” and I doubt he did.
Anyway, as I originally suggested here, being born more than fifty years before someone—in some cases, more than twenty years before someone—is good cause to be suspicious of trying to use Aumann on them. Of course I’m sure you can find many bright <50 researchers who would agree with Schank!
But in any case, maybe we should swap the whole scenario to consider my disagreement with Norvig, whom I confess to be a powerful and prestigious mind with modern arms and armor?
@Hal: “Human augmentation” means things like neuropharmeceuticals, gene therapy, or even brain-computer interfaces, not full-scale human-equiv uploading and simulation before the first AI.
Robin, I would consider Norvig a very separate issue from Schank or Brooks. Either that or Stuart Russell wrote all the good parts of “AI a modern approach” and I doubt he did.
Anyway, as I originally suggested here, being born more than fifty years before someone—in some cases, more than twenty years before someone—is good cause to be suspicious of trying to use Aumann on them. Of course I’m sure you can find many bright <50 researchers who would agree with Schank!
But in any case, maybe we should swap the whole scenario to consider my disagreement with Norvig, whom I confess to be a powerful and prestigious mind with modern arms and armor?