Okay, how does standard political philosophy say you should fairly / rightly construct an ultrapowerful superintelligence (not to be confused with a corruptible government) that can compute moral and metamoral questions only given a well-formed specification of what is to be computed?
After you’ve carried out these instructions, what’s the standard reply to someone who says, “Friendly to who?” or “So you get to decide what’s Friendly”?
Okay, how does standard political philosophy say you should fairly / rightly construct an ultrapowerful superintelligence (not to be confused with a corruptible government) that can compute moral and metamoral questions only given a well-formed specification of what is to be computed?
After you’ve carried out these instructions, what’s the standard reply to someone who says, “Friendly to who?” or “So you get to decide what’s Friendly”?