This is a more kludgy dense read than some of Kaj’s other writing. I think I’m mostly only making sense of it because I’m familiar with similar ideas already. Some of those from Kaj’s later posts! I guess I’m not that interested in an overview of a particular book? I can’t tell if I read this post before, or if the same points were repeated in other writing. But I’m getting stuck on some clinical wordiness.
Doesn’t seem… foundational? It’s a starting-to-build on literature and other posts. I’m not sure how someone else would build on it.
If anything, I want to dig deeper into the transcript and concrete examples. Step back from the clinical language, and start thinking in terms of specific actions + predictions that individuals can test. That is likely a point in favor of directly reading the book.
This is a more kludgy dense read than some of Kaj’s other writing. I think I’m mostly only making sense of it because I’m familiar with similar ideas already. Some of those from Kaj’s later posts! I guess I’m not that interested in an overview of a particular book? I can’t tell if I read this post before, or if the same points were repeated in other writing. But I’m getting stuck on some clinical wordiness.
Doesn’t seem… foundational? It’s a starting-to-build on literature and other posts. I’m not sure how someone else would build on it.
If anything, I want to dig deeper into the transcript and concrete examples. Step back from the clinical language, and start thinking in terms of specific actions + predictions that individuals can test. That is likely a point in favor of directly reading the book.